Contrastivism about reasons and ought

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Contrastivism about some concept says that the concept is relativized to sets of alternatives. Relative to some alternatives, the concept may apply, but relative to others, it may not. This article explores contrastivism about the central normative concepts of reasons and ought. Contrastivism about reasons says that a consideration may be a reason for an action A rather than one alternative, B, but may not be a reason for A rather than some other alternative, C. Likewise, contrastivism about ought says that it might be that you ought to perform action A rather than action B, while it is not the case that you ought to perform A rather than some other alternative, C. It explores the shape and motivations for, and the relationship between, these contrastivist theories.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-388
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jun 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contrastivism about reasons and ought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this