TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrary siblings
T2 - Syria, Jordan and the Iraq War
AU - Hinnebusch, Raymond
AU - Quilliam, Neil
PY - 2006/1/1
Y1 - 2006/1/1
N2 - Jordan and Syria, severed parts of the same country, were in many ways ‘siblings’: their systemic situation, as economically weak small states surrounded by more powerful enemies, was similarly vulnerable; their leaders at the time of the Iraq War were of a similar ‘modernising’ generation; the identities of their populations were similarly Arab-Islamic. Yet, they followed diametrically opposite policies toward the invasion of Iraq: Jordan bandwagoning with the United States and Syria defying it. This contrary behaviour is explained by their differential experiences of state formation and the differing social forces incorporated and identities institutionalised in Ba'thist Syria and Hashemite Jordan.
AB - Jordan and Syria, severed parts of the same country, were in many ways ‘siblings’: their systemic situation, as economically weak small states surrounded by more powerful enemies, was similarly vulnerable; their leaders at the time of the Iraq War were of a similar ‘modernising’ generation; the identities of their populations were similarly Arab-Islamic. Yet, they followed diametrically opposite policies toward the invasion of Iraq: Jordan bandwagoning with the United States and Syria defying it. This contrary behaviour is explained by their differential experiences of state formation and the differing social forces incorporated and identities institutionalised in Ba'thist Syria and Hashemite Jordan.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050835811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09557570600869564
DO - 10.1080/09557570600869564
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050835811
SN - 0955-7571
VL - 19
SP - 513
EP - 528
JO - Cambridge Review of International Affairs
JF - Cambridge Review of International Affairs
IS - 3
ER -