Abstract
The central contentions of this paper are two:first, that contextualism about knowledge cannot fulfil the eirenic promise which, for those who are drawn to it, constitutes, I believe, its main attraction; secondly, that the basic diagnosis of epistemological scepticism as somehow entrapping us, by diverting attention from a surreptitious shift to a special rarefied intellectual context , rests on inattention to the details of the principal sceptical paradoxes. These contentions are consistent with knowledge-contextualism, of some stripe or other, being true. What follows will not bear directly on that.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 236-262 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | The Philosophical Quarterly |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 219 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contextualism and scepticism: Even-handedness, factivity and surreptitiously raising standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver