Context in memory is reconstructed, not encoded

Alexander Easton*, Aidan J. Horner, Simon J. James, Jeremy Kendal, John Sutton, James A. Ainge

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Context has long been regarded as an important element of long-term memory, and episodic memory in particular. The ability to remember not only the object or focus of a memory but also contextual details allow us to reconstruct integrated representations of events. However, despite its prevalence in the memory literature, context remains difficult to define and identify, with different studies using context to refer to different sets of stimuli or concepts. These varying definitions of context have not prevented it from being a key element of many models of memory. Within these models, context is usually explicitly encoded as an element of an event and processed through different neural pathways to other elements of the event, such as objects. Here we challenge the notion that context in memory is encoded. We offer an alternative where context in memory takes a variety of forms depending on the question being asked. We propose events are simply encoded, but the focus of retrieval (object) and context are not defined until recall.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105934
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume167
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Context
  • Episodic memory
  • Hippocampus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Context in memory is reconstructed, not encoded'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this