Abstract
This chapter explores the centrality of rhetoric in the formation of landscapes of hate by examining the application of the label ‘inner city’. A discourse analysis of British newspapers and policy documents in the 1980s is undertaken to show how applying the term ‘inner city’ labelled Toxteth, in Liverpool, UK, giving it a specific, racialized, classed, stigmatized and ‘othered’ identity; and that this was a deliberate rhetorical and ideological act making Toxteth the ‘poster child’ of the 1980s ‘inner city problem’ and the testing ground for related solutions. The chapter’s historical study of Toxteth represents a paradigmatic case from which we can learn and apply the findings to contemporary debates regarding the invention of spatial stigma and hate, and the later attempts to ‘unhate’ areas through white middle-class gentrification and privatization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Landscapes of hate |
| Subtitle of host publication | tracing spaces, relations and responses |
| Editors | Edward Hall, John Clayton, Catherine Donovan |
| Place of Publication | Bristol |
| Publisher | Bristol University Press |
| Chapter | 4 |
| Pages | 58–77 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781529215212 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781529215175, 9781529215182 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Sept 2022 |
Publication series
| Name | Spaces and practices of justice |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Inner city
- Stigmatization
- Gentrification
- Unhating
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Constructing Britain’s hated landscapes: the linguistic and ideological construction of Toxteth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver