Conservation conflict hotspots: mapping impacts, risk perception and tolerance for sustainable conservation management

Lou Lecuyer, Sophie Calmé, Birgit Schmook*, Rehema M. White

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Global processes manifesting as activities in local places have led to an increase in documented conservation conflicts. Conservation conflicts are sometimes labelled human-wildlife conflict, focusing only on the direct negative impact of species (usually wildlife) on humans or vice versa. However, many authors now recognize that conservation conflicts arise between people with diverse views, when one party acts against the interests of another. They are thus human-human conflicts and not merely an impact on or from conservation. Conflict is not always directly correlated with impact because perceptions of risk, levels of tolerance and conservation values influence human responses. This review aims to define the concept of ‘conservation conflict hotspots’ and explore its practical applications in conservation. We propose that the interaction of impact, risk perception, level of tolerance in a context of conservation values can be mapped at a local scale, with spatial visualization assisting the prediction, understanding and management of such hotspots. The term conservation value incorporates measures of indigeneity, endemicity and demography along with emotional or cultural attachment to species or places. The umbrella terms of risk perception and tolerance capture many of the aspects of attitude, values and individual demographics that can influence people’s actions, enabling contextualization of relevant social factors at local scales. Spatially mapped layers enable us to plan and target conservation efforts towards human as well as ecological factors. The concept of ‘conservation conflict hotspot’ emphasizes the need for transdisciplinary research to understand underlying drivers of conflict and for dialogical and peace-building approaches to facilitate trust and cooperation amongst actors. We can thus address conflicts and achieve sustainable outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number909908
Number of pages12
JournalFrontiers in Conservation Science
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Aug 2022

Keywords

  • Human-wildlife interaction
  • Attitude
  • Conservation values
  • Sustainable development
  • Conflict transformation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conservation conflict hotspots: mapping impacts, risk perception and tolerance for sustainable conservation management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this