Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of sotrovimab and molnupiravir for preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients on kidney replacement therapy: observational study using the OpenSAFELY-UKRR and SRR databases

  • Bang Zheng*
  • , Jacqueline Campbell
  • , Edward J. Carr
  • , John Tazare
  • , Linda Nab
  • , Viyaasan Mahalingasivam
  • , Amir Mehrkar
  • , Shalini Santhakumaran
  • , Retha Steenkamp
  • , Fiona Loud
  • , Susan Lyon
  • , Miranda Scanlon
  • , William J. Hulme
  • , Amelia C.A. Green
  • , Helen J. Curtis
  • , Louis Fisher
  • , Edward Parker
  • , Ben Goldacre
  • , Ian Douglas
  • , Stephen Evans
  • Brian MacKenna, Samira Bell, Laurie A. Tomlinson, Dorothea Nitsch, OpenSAFELY Collaborative, LH&W NCS (or CONVALESCENCE) Collaborative
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. Due to limited inclusion of patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in clinical trials, the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) therapies in this population remains unclear. We sought to address this by comparing the effectiveness of sotrovimab against molnupiravir, two commonly used treatments for non-hospitalised KRT patients with COVID-19 in the UK. 
Methods. With the approval of National Health Service England, we used routine clinical data from 24 million patients in England within the OpenSAFELY-TPP platform linked to the UK Renal Registry (UKRR) to identify patients on KRT. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of sotrovimab versus molnupiravir with regards to COVID-19-related hospitalisations or deaths in the subsequent 28 days. We also conducted a complementary analysis using data from the Scottish Renal Registry (SRR). 
Results. Among the 2367 kidney patients treated with sotrovimab (n = 1852) or molnupiravir (n = 515) between 16 December 2021 and 1 August 2022 in England, 38 cases (1.6%) of COVID-19-related hospitalisations/deaths were observed. Sotrovimab was associated with substantially lower outcome risk than molnupiravir {adjusted HR 0.35 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17–0.71]; P = .004}, with results remaining robust in multiple sensitivity analyses. In the SRR cohort, sotrovimab showed a trend toward lower outcome risk than molnupiravir [HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.13–1.21); P = .106]. In both datasets, sotrovimab had no evidence of an association with other hospitalisation/death compared with molnupiravir (HRs ranged from 0.73 to 1.29; P > .05). Conclusions. In routine care of non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19 on KRT, sotrovimab was associated with a lower risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with molnupiravir during Omicron waves.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2048-2058
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Kidney Journal
Volume16
Issue number11
Early online date29 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • Cohort studies
  • Comparative effectiveness research
  • COVID-19
  • Renal replacement therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative effectiveness of sotrovimab and molnupiravir for preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients on kidney replacement therapy: observational study using the OpenSAFELY-UKRR and SRR databases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this