Abstract
This paper explores the editorial policies and practices of three
scientific journal published in Edinburgh in the first half of the 19th
century. The first of these was the Edinburgh Philosophical Journal (1819–1826), and its continuation as the Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal
(1826–1854). It was edited until 1824 by Robert Jameson, Edinburgh's
professor of natural history, and David Brewster, who was a natural
philosopher, scientific writer, and editor. Brewster left in 1824 to
found his own journal, the Edinburgh Journal of Science (1824–1832). The third journal published in Edinburgh in this period was the Edinburgh Journal of Natural and Geographical Science
(1829–1831), edited by Henry H. Cheek and William Ainsworth, two
medical students at the University of Edinburgh. All three journals were
direct competitors, being strikingly similar in form and content. As
well as competing with Jameson's journal for readers and authors, Cheek
and Ainsworth also used their journal to directly attack him in print.
This paper sheds new light on the ways the editorship of these journals
was used not only to consolidate and extend circles of patronage in
early 19th‐century science, but also to challenge existing centres of
authority.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Centaurus |
Volume | Early View |
Early online date | 5 May 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 5 May 2020 |
Keywords
- David Brewster
- Editorship
- Henry H .Cheek
- Robert Jameson
- Scientific journals