Cognitive differences between orang-utan species: a test of the cultural intelligence hypothesis

Sofia I. F. Forss, Erik Willems, Josep Call, Carel P. van Schaik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cultural species can-or even prefer to-learn their skills from conspecifics. According to the cultural intelligence hypothesis, selection on underlying mechanisms not only improves this social learning ability but also the asocial (individual) learning ability. Thus, species with systematically richer opportunities to socially acquire knowledge and skills should over time evolve to become more intelligent. We experimentally compared the problem-solving ability of Sumatran orang-utans (Pongo abelii), which are sociable in the wild, with that of the closely related, but more solitary Bornean orang-utans (P. pygmaeus), under the homogeneous environmental conditions provided by zoos. Our results revealed that Sumatrans showed superior innate problem-solving skills to Borneans, and also showed greater inhibition and a more cautious and less rough exploration style. This pattern is consistent with the cultural intelligence hypothesis, which predicts that the more sociable of two sister species experienced stronger selection on cognitive mechanisms underlying learning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number30516
Number of pages12
JournalScientific Reports
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive differences between orang-utan species: a test of the cultural intelligence hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this