Co-producing a post-trafficking agenda: collaborating on transforming citizenship in Nepal

Nina Laurie; Diane Richardson; Meena Poudel; Shakti Samuha; Janet Townsend

doi:10.1080/09614524.2015.1029436

Co-producing a post-trafficking agenda: collaborating on transforming citizenship in Nepal

Nina Laurie^*, Diane Richardson, Meena Poudel, Shakti Samuha, Janet Townsend

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article discusses how a new agenda on post-trafficking is gaining momentum through academic and activist anti-trafficking collaborations focused on co-producing knowledge with women who have returned from trafficking situations. Co-production of this nature is important as the issues raised by post-trafficking scenarios are largely ignored in anti-trafficking strategies, and the stigmatisation and poverty which women in these circumstances encounter means they rarely have a voice in policy-making. Drawing on research in Nepal, we present four types of co-produced data around transforming citizenship post-trafficking, and reflect on the strategies for generating and using them for advocacy purposes.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	465-477
Number of pages	13
Journal	Development in Practice
Volume	25
Issue number	4
Early online date	24 Apr 2015
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2015.1029436
Publication status	Published - 19 May 2015

Keywords

Aid – Capacity development
Civil society – Partnership
Gender and diversity
Governance and public policy
Labour and livelihoods – Migration
NGOs
Rights
South Asia

Access to Document

10.1080/09614524.2015.1029436Licence: CC BY

Laurie_2015_DiP_Post-traffickingAgenda_CC
© 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Final published version, 425 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{dfb788cd4bc6407383b953bf755650a6,

title = "Co-producing a post-trafficking agenda: collaborating on transforming citizenship in Nepal",

abstract = "This article discusses how a new agenda on post-trafficking is gaining momentum through academic and activist anti-trafficking collaborations focused on co-producing knowledge with women who have returned from trafficking situations. Co-production of this nature is important as the issues raised by post-trafficking scenarios are largely ignored in anti-trafficking strategies, and the stigmatisation and poverty which women in these circumstances encounter means they rarely have a voice in policy-making. Drawing on research in Nepal, we present four types of co-produced data around transforming citizenship post-trafficking, and reflect on the strategies for generating and using them for advocacy purposes.",

keywords = "Aid – Capacity development, Civil society – Partnership, Gender and diversity, Governance and public policy, Labour and livelihoods – Migration, NGOs, Rights, South Asia",

author = "Nina Laurie and Diane Richardson and Meena Poudel and Shakti Samuha and Janet Townsend",

year = "2015",

month = may,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1080/09614524.2015.1029436",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "465--477",

journal = "Development in Practice",

issn = "0961-4524",

publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co-producing a post-trafficking agenda

T2 - collaborating on transforming citizenship in Nepal

AU - Laurie, Nina

AU - Richardson, Diane

AU - Poudel, Meena

AU - Samuha, Shakti

AU - Townsend, Janet

PY - 2015/5/19

Y1 - 2015/5/19

N2 - This article discusses how a new agenda on post-trafficking is gaining momentum through academic and activist anti-trafficking collaborations focused on co-producing knowledge with women who have returned from trafficking situations. Co-production of this nature is important as the issues raised by post-trafficking scenarios are largely ignored in anti-trafficking strategies, and the stigmatisation and poverty which women in these circumstances encounter means they rarely have a voice in policy-making. Drawing on research in Nepal, we present four types of co-produced data around transforming citizenship post-trafficking, and reflect on the strategies for generating and using them for advocacy purposes.

AB - This article discusses how a new agenda on post-trafficking is gaining momentum through academic and activist anti-trafficking collaborations focused on co-producing knowledge with women who have returned from trafficking situations. Co-production of this nature is important as the issues raised by post-trafficking scenarios are largely ignored in anti-trafficking strategies, and the stigmatisation and poverty which women in these circumstances encounter means they rarely have a voice in policy-making. Drawing on research in Nepal, we present four types of co-produced data around transforming citizenship post-trafficking, and reflect on the strategies for generating and using them for advocacy purposes.

KW - Aid – Capacity development

KW - Civil society – Partnership

KW - Gender and diversity

KW - Governance and public policy

KW - Labour and livelihoods – Migration

KW - NGOs

KW - Rights

KW - South Asia

U2 - 10.1080/09614524.2015.1029436

DO - 10.1080/09614524.2015.1029436

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928472148

SN - 0961-4524

VL - 25

SP - 465

EP - 477

JO - Development in Practice

JF - Development in Practice

IS - 4

ER -

Co-producing a post-trafficking agenda: collaborating on transforming citizenship in Nepal

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this