Close looking and conviction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article offers theoretical and practical reflections on the operations involved in description and interpretation based on ‘close looking’. Explanations are given of the necessary appeal to contexts of origin or reception in order to disambiguate works of art, the widespread though rarely acknowledged reliance on an attenuated form of intention, and the way in practice that contexts are mobilised in the description or ‘redescription’ of works of art. Wider points made concern scepticism about the idea that works of art might determine their own interpretation (including problems with claims made as part of the phenomenological turn in image studies for the priority of direct or unmediated response to works of art), the quasi-allegorical nature of even ostensibly object-centred interpretation, and consequences of the fact that modernism can function as a kind of context.
Original languageEnglish
Article number156
Pages (from-to)156-177
JournalArt History
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date12 Sept 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Close looking and conviction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this