TY - JOUR
T1 - Classifying accuracy of fin whale range estimates from single seismic sensors
AU - Pereira, Andreia
AU - Marques, Carolina
AU - Hilmo, Rose
AU - Mellinger, David K.
AU - Wilcock, William S. D.
AU - Marques, Tiago A.
AU - Harris, Danielle V.
AU - Matias, Luis
N1 - Funding: This research was funded by the Office of Naval Research under Award No. N00014-21-1-2564 and the Living Marine Resources program under Award No. N39430-21-C-2208. A.P. and L.M. were partially funded by the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, FCT, I.P./MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC): Grant Nos. UID/PRR2/50019/2025, LA/P/0068/2020, and UID/50019/20252 and by the European Union SUBMERSE, GA HORIZON-INFRA-2022-TECH-01-101095055; Geo-INQUIRE, GA HORIZON-INFRA-2021-SERV-01-101058518. C.M. and T.A.M. were partially supported under CEAUL's strategic project Grant No. UID/00006/2025.3 C.M. was also supported by Portuguese government funds through FCT under the doctoral scholarship FCT/CEAUL (Grant No. UI/BD/154258/2022).
PY - 2026/2/13
Y1 - 2026/2/13
N2 - Ocean-bottom seismometers (OBSs) are used increasingly often to track baleen whale signals, employing single-station ranging techniques such as the three-component (3C) method. By using the orientation of ground motion from OBS components, the 3C method provides robust range estimates of direct-path signals within a validity range that relates to instrument depth. Consequently, the method requires a classification process to determine whether a signal falls within the validity range. Fin whale tracks, composed of 20-Hz notes from six locations, were used to develop and evaluate three classification models: decision trees (DTs), generalized additive models, and neural networks. Models were trained using different data combinations and incorporated a comprehensive set of variables related to channel amplitude, signal quality, polarization, and estimated signal angles. The DT achieved the highest performance, reaching an accuracy of 0.94 on the test data. Key variables for predicting the validity of the 3C ranges included the difference between observed horizontal-to-vertical amplitude ratios and its theoretical value, polarization metrics, and the amplitude of one horizontally oriented OBS component (Y-channel). The resulting framework contributes to improving the utility of seismic data for biological studies, which are critical for marine mammal monitoring and conservation strategies.
AB - Ocean-bottom seismometers (OBSs) are used increasingly often to track baleen whale signals, employing single-station ranging techniques such as the three-component (3C) method. By using the orientation of ground motion from OBS components, the 3C method provides robust range estimates of direct-path signals within a validity range that relates to instrument depth. Consequently, the method requires a classification process to determine whether a signal falls within the validity range. Fin whale tracks, composed of 20-Hz notes from six locations, were used to develop and evaluate three classification models: decision trees (DTs), generalized additive models, and neural networks. Models were trained using different data combinations and incorporated a comprehensive set of variables related to channel amplitude, signal quality, polarization, and estimated signal angles. The DT achieved the highest performance, reaching an accuracy of 0.94 on the test data. Key variables for predicting the validity of the 3C ranges included the difference between observed horizontal-to-vertical amplitude ratios and its theoretical value, polarization metrics, and the amplitude of one horizontally oriented OBS component (Y-channel). The resulting framework contributes to improving the utility of seismic data for biological studies, which are critical for marine mammal monitoring and conservation strategies.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030018151
U2 - 10.1121/10.0042399
DO - 10.1121/10.0042399
M3 - Article
C2 - 41685923
AN - SCOPUS:105030018151
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 159
SP - 1430
EP - 1445
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 2
ER -