Chlorophyll fluorescence as a proxy for microphytobenthic biomass: alternatives to the current methodology.

B. Jesus, R. Perkins, M. Consalvey, V. Brotas, David Maxwell Paterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorescence has been used as a proxy of microphytobenthic biomass after a dark adaptation period of 15 min to stabilise the minimum fluorescence yield (F-o(15)). This methodology was investigated for in situ migratory and ex situ engineered non-migratory biofilms, comparing dark adaptation to low (5% ambient) and far-red light treatments over different emersion periods. Far-red and low light reduced potential errors resulting from light history effects, by reversal of non-photochemical quenching after 5 min of treatment, compared to over 10 min required by conventional dark adaptation. An in situ decline of minimum fluorescence yield over 15 min was observed during the dark adaptation for migratory biofilms, but was not observed in the non-migratory biofilms indicating that the major cause of decline was downward vertical migration of cells into the sediment. This pattern occurred in far-red light after 10 min, but not for the low light treatment, indicating that low light maintained the biomass at the surface of the sediment. It is therefore concluded that low light treatment is a better option than conventional dark adaptation for the measurement of minimum fluorescence as a proxy of microphytobenthic biomass.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-28
Number of pages12
JournalMarine Biology
Volume150
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

Keywords

  • DIATOM PHAEODACTYLUM-TRICORNUTUM
  • PHOTOSYNTHETIC ELECTRON-TRANSPORT
  • DIADINOXANTHIN DE-EPOXIDASE
  • INTERTIDAL MICROPHYTOBENTHOS
  • A FLUORESCENCE
  • MIGRATORY RHYTHMS
  • PROTON GRADIENT
  • LIGHT
  • ASSEMBLAGES
  • EFFICIENCY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chlorophyll fluorescence as a proxy for microphytobenthic biomass: alternatives to the current methodology.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this