Abstract
In contrast with contemporary heresiological discourse, the Codex Theodosianus,
a Roman imperial law code promulgated in 438, makes no systematic
gendered references to heretics or heresy. According to late Roman
legislative rhetoric, heretics are demented, polluted and infected with
pestilence, but they are not seductive temptresses, vulgar ‘women’ or
weak-minded whores. This article explores the gap between the precisely
marked terrain of Christian heresiologists and (Christian) legislators.
The first part gives a brief overview of early Christian heresiology.
The second explores late Roman legislation and the construction of the
heretic as a ‘legal subject’ in the Codex Theodosianus.
The third turns to the celebrated account crafted by Pope Leo I of
anti-Manichaean trials at Rome in 443/4, arguing that they should be
understood as part of a much broader developing regime of ecclesial
power, rather than as concrete applications of existing imperial
anti-heresy laws.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The church and the law |
Editors | Rosamond McKitterick, Charlott Methuen, Andrew Spicer |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Pages | 36-59 |
Volume | 56 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781108839631 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2020 |
Publication series
Name | Studies in Church History |
---|---|
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
ISSN (Print) | 0424-2084 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2059-0644 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''Cherchez la femme!' Heresy and law in late antiquity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Caroline Humfress
- School of History - Professor in Medieval History, Deputy Head of School
- St Andrews Centre for the Receptions of Antiquity
- Centre for Minorities Research
- Centre for Late Antique Studies
- Institute of Legal and Constitutional Research
- Centre for Global Law and Governance
- St Andrews Institute of Medieval Studies
Person: Academic