Abstract
This article provides a comparative macro-level overview of political development in Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt. It examines their evolution from the colonial period through several distinct phases, showing how differences in their origins were followed over time by a certain convergence towards a common post-populist form of authoritarianism, albeit still distinguished according to monarchic and republican legitimacy principles. On this basis, it assesses how past state formation trajectories made the republics more vulnerable to the Arab uprising but also what differences they make for the prospects of post-uprising democratisation. While in Morocco the monarch's legitimacy allows it to continue divide-and-rule politics, in Egypt the army's historic central role in politics has been restored, while in Tunisia the trade union movement has facilitated a greater democratic transition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 12-30 |
| Journal | British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 12 Dec 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Arab Uprising
- Egypt
- Tunisia
- Morocco
- state formation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Change and continuity after the Arab Uprising: the consequences of state formation in Arab North African states'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver