Abstract
Adaptation is conventionally regarded as occurring at the level of the individual organism. However, in recent years there has been a revival of interest in the possibility for group adaptations and superorganisms. Here, we provide the first formal theory of group adaptation. In particular: (1) we clarify the distinction between group selection and group adaptation, framing the former in terms of gene frequency change and the latter in terms of optimization; (2) we capture the superorganism in the form of a 'group as maximizing agent' analogy that links an optimization program to a model of a group-structured population; (3) we demonstrate that between-group selection can lead to group adaptation, but only in rather special circumstances; (4) we provide formal support for the view that between-group selection is the best definition for 'group selection'; and (5) we reveal that mechanisms of conflict resolution such as policing cannot be regarded as group adaptations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 659-671 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Evolutionary Biology |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2009 |
Keywords
- formal Darwinism
- group as maximizing agent
- group selection
- inclusive fitness
- individuality
- kin selection
- levels of selection
- major transitions
- natural selection
- Price equation
- GROUP SELECTION
- INCLUSIVE FITNESS
- KIN SELECTION
- REPRODUCTIVE VALUE
- SOCIAL SEMANTICS
- INSECT SOCIETIES
- PRICE EQUATION
- SOFT SELECTION
- HARD SELECTION
- EVOLUTION