Canberra planning for gender kinds

J. Fletcher*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper I argue that the Canberra Plan is ill-equipped to offer a satisfactory theory of gender. Insofar as the Canberra Plan aims to provide a general and unified approach to philosophical theorising, this is a significant problem. I argue that this deficit in their method stems from the robust role assigned to pre-theoretical beliefs in constructing philosophical analyses. I utilise a critical conception of ideology to explain why our pre-theoretic beliefs about certain social kinds are likely to deliver politically dubious metaphysics of the social world. The first half of the paper is dedicated to exercising this theoretical shortcoming. In the second half, I suggest a way in which the Canberra Plan can address and rectify this problem, with a view to maintaining the theoretical viability of the Canberra Plan with respect to politically important concepts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Social Ontology
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date25 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Apr 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Canberra planning for gender kinds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this