TY - JOUR
T1 - CamGFR v2
T2 - a new model for estimating the glomerular filtration rate from standardized or non-standardized creatinine in patients with cancer
AU - Williams, Edward H
AU - Flint, Thomas R
AU - Connell, Claire M
AU - Giglio, Daniel
AU - Lee, Hassal
AU - Ha, Taehoon
AU - Gablenz, Eva
AU - Bird, Nicholas J
AU - Weaver, James M J
AU - Potts, Harry
AU - Whitley, Cameron T
AU - Bookman, Michael A
AU - Lynch, Andy G
AU - Meyer, Hannah V
AU - Tavaré, Simon
AU - Janowitz, Tobias
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Purpose:
Management of patients with cancer, specifically carboplatin dosing,
requires accurate knowledge of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Direct
measurement of GFR is resource limited. Available models for estimated
GFR (eGFR) are optimized for patients without cancer and either isotope
dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)- or non-IDMS–standardized creatinine
measurements. We present an eGFR model for patients with cancer
compatible with both creatinine measurement methods.Experimental Design:
GFR measurements, biometrics, and IDMS- or non-IDMS–standardized
creatinine values were collected for adult patients from three cancer
centers. Using statistical modeling, an IDMS and non-IDMS
creatinine-compatible eGFR model (CamGFR v2) was developed. Its
performance was compared with that of the existing models Chronic Kidney
Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in
Renal Disease (MDRD), Full Age Spectrum (FAS), Lund–Malmö revised, and
CamGFR v1, using statistics for bias, precision, accuracy, and clinical
robustness.Results:
A total of 3,083 IDMS- and 4,612 non-IDMS–standardized creatinine
measurements were obtained from 7,240 patients. IDMS-standardized
creatinine values were lower than non-IDMS–standardized values in
within-center comparisons (13.8% lower in Cambridge; P < 0.0001 and 19.3% lower in Manchester; P
< 0.0001), and more consistent between centers. CamGFR v2 was the
most accurate [root-mean-squared error for IDMS, 14.97 mL/minute (95%
confidence interval, 13.84–16.13) and non-IDMS, 15.74 mL/minute
(14.86–16.63)], most clinically robust [proportion with >20% error of
calculated carboplatin dose for IDMS, 0.12 (0.09–0.14) and non-IDMS,
0.17 (0.15–0.2)], and least biased [median residual for IDMS, 0.73
mL/minute (−0.68 to 2.2) and non-IDMS, −0.43 mL/minute (−1.48 to 0.91)]
eGFR model, particularly when eGFR was larger than 60 ml/minute.Conclusions:
CamGFR v2 can utilize IDMS- and non-IDMS–standardized creatinine
measurements and outperforms previous models. CamGFR v2 should be
examined prospectively as a practice-changing standard of care for
eGFR-based carboplatin dosing.
AB - Purpose:
Management of patients with cancer, specifically carboplatin dosing,
requires accurate knowledge of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Direct
measurement of GFR is resource limited. Available models for estimated
GFR (eGFR) are optimized for patients without cancer and either isotope
dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)- or non-IDMS–standardized creatinine
measurements. We present an eGFR model for patients with cancer
compatible with both creatinine measurement methods.Experimental Design:
GFR measurements, biometrics, and IDMS- or non-IDMS–standardized
creatinine values were collected for adult patients from three cancer
centers. Using statistical modeling, an IDMS and non-IDMS
creatinine-compatible eGFR model (CamGFR v2) was developed. Its
performance was compared with that of the existing models Chronic Kidney
Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in
Renal Disease (MDRD), Full Age Spectrum (FAS), Lund–Malmö revised, and
CamGFR v1, using statistics for bias, precision, accuracy, and clinical
robustness.Results:
A total of 3,083 IDMS- and 4,612 non-IDMS–standardized creatinine
measurements were obtained from 7,240 patients. IDMS-standardized
creatinine values were lower than non-IDMS–standardized values in
within-center comparisons (13.8% lower in Cambridge; P < 0.0001 and 19.3% lower in Manchester; P
< 0.0001), and more consistent between centers. CamGFR v2 was the
most accurate [root-mean-squared error for IDMS, 14.97 mL/minute (95%
confidence interval, 13.84–16.13) and non-IDMS, 15.74 mL/minute
(14.86–16.63)], most clinically robust [proportion with >20% error of
calculated carboplatin dose for IDMS, 0.12 (0.09–0.14) and non-IDMS,
0.17 (0.15–0.2)], and least biased [median residual for IDMS, 0.73
mL/minute (−0.68 to 2.2) and non-IDMS, −0.43 mL/minute (−1.48 to 0.91)]
eGFR model, particularly when eGFR was larger than 60 ml/minute.Conclusions:
CamGFR v2 can utilize IDMS- and non-IDMS–standardized creatinine
measurements and outperforms previous models. CamGFR v2 should be
examined prospectively as a practice-changing standard of care for
eGFR-based carboplatin dosing.
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3201
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3201
M3 - Article
C2 - 33303580
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 27
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 5
ER -