Badici on Inclosures and the Liar Paradox

Graham Priest

doi:10.1080/00048400903018980

Badici on Inclosures and the Liar Paradox

Graham Priest

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

Abstract

Badici [2008] criticizes views of Priest [2002] concerning the Inclosure Schema and the paradoxes of self-reference. This article explains why his criticisms are to be rejected.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	359-366
Number of pages	8
Journal	Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Volume	88
Issue number	2
Early online date	6 Jul 2009
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400903018980
Publication status	Published - 2010

Access to Document

10.1080/00048400903018980

FOUNDATIONS OF LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE: Foundations of Logical Consequence
Read, S. (PI), Priest, G. (CoI), Shapiro, S. (CoI) & Celani, L. (Student)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
1/01/09 → 30/06/12
Project: Standard

Cite this

@article{8523400ea5924819b6bf7f3472a19b07,

title = "Badici on Inclosures and the Liar Paradox",

abstract = "Badici [2008] criticizes views of Priest [2002] concerning the Inclosure Schema and the paradoxes of self-reference. This article explains why his criticisms are to be rejected.",

author = "Graham Priest",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1080/00048400903018980",

language = "English",

volume = "88",

pages = "359--366",

journal = "Australasian Journal of Philosophy",

issn = "0004-8402",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Badici on Inclosures and the Liar Paradox

AU - Priest, Graham

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Badici [2008] criticizes views of Priest [2002] concerning the Inclosure Schema and the paradoxes of self-reference. This article explains why his criticisms are to be rejected.

AB - Badici [2008] criticizes views of Priest [2002] concerning the Inclosure Schema and the paradoxes of self-reference. This article explains why his criticisms are to be rejected.

U2 - 10.1080/00048400903018980

DO - 10.1080/00048400903018980

M3 - Editorial

SN - 0004-8402

VL - 88

SP - 359

EP - 366

JO - Australasian Journal of Philosophy

JF - Australasian Journal of Philosophy

IS - 2

ER -

Badici on Inclosures and the Liar Paradox

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

FOUNDATIONS OF LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE: Foundations of Logical Consequence

Cite this