Projects per year
Abstract
Badici [2008] criticizes views of Priest [2002] concerning the Inclosure Schema and the paradoxes of self-reference. This article explains why his criticisms are to be rejected.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 359-366 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy |
Volume | 88 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 6 Jul 2009 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Badici on Inclosures and the Liar Paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
FOUNDATIONS OF LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE: Foundations of Logical Consequence
Read, S. (PI), Priest, G. G. (CoI), Shapiro, S. (CoI) & Celani, L. (Student)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
1/01/09 → 30/06/12
Project: Standard