Automating Event-B invariant proofs by rippling and proof patching

Yuhui Lin, Alan Bundy, Gudmund Grov, Ewen Maclean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The use of formal method techniques can contribute to the production of more reliable and dependable systems. However, a common bottleneck for industrial adoption of such techniques is the needs for interactive proofs. We use a popular formal method, called Event-B, as our working domain, and set invariant preservation (INV) proofs as targets, because INV proofs can account for a significant proportion of the proofs requiring human interactions. We apply an inductive theorem proving technique, called rippling, for Event-B INV proofs. Rippling automates proofs using meta-level guidance. The guidance is in particular useful to develop proof patches to recover failed proof attempts. We are interested in the case when a missing lemma is required. We combine a scheme-based theory-exploration system, called IsaScheme [MRMDB10], with rippling to develop a proof patch via lemma discovery. We also develop two new proof patches to unfold operator definitions and to suggest case-splits, respectively. The combined use of rippling with these three proof patches as a proof method significantly improves the proof automation for our evaluation set.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-129
Number of pages35
JournalFormal Aspects of Computing
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date2 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Formal verification
  • Event-B
  • Automated reasoning
  • Rippling
  • Lemma conjecturing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automating Event-B invariant proofs by rippling and proof patching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this