TY - JOUR
T1 - Automatic imitation effects are influenced by experience of synchronous action in children
AU - O'Sullivan, Eoin Patrick
AU - Bijvoet-van den Berg,, Simone
AU - Caldwell, Christine A
N1 - Eoin P. O’Sullivan was supported by a departmental studentship from the University of Stirling’s Psychology Division.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - By their fourth year of life, children are expert imitators, but it is
unclear how this ability develops. One approach suggests that certain
types of experience might forge associations between the sensory and
motor representations of an action that may facilitate imitation at a
later time. Sensorimotor experience of this sort may occur when an
infant’s action is imitated by a caregiver or when socially synchronous
action occurs. This learning approach, therefore, predicts that the
strength of sensory–motor associations should depend on the frequency
and quality of previous experience. Here, we tested this prediction by
examining automatic imitation, that is, the tendency of an action
stimulus to facilitate the performance of that action and interfere with
the performance of an incompatible action. We required children (aged
between 3 years 8 months and 7 years 11 months) to respond to actions
performed by an experimenter (e.g., two hands clapping) with both
compatible actions (i.e., two hands clapping) and incompatible actions
(i.e., two hands waving) at different stages in the experimental
procedure. As predicted by a learning account, actions thought to be
performed in synchrony (i.e., clapping/waving) produced stronger
automatic imitation effects when compared with actions where previous
sensorimotor experience is likely to be more limited (e.g.,
pointing/hand closing). Furthermore, these automatic imitation effects
were not found to vary with age, with both compatible and incompatible
responses quickening with age. These findings suggest a role for
sensorimotor experience in the development of imitative ability.
AB - By their fourth year of life, children are expert imitators, but it is
unclear how this ability develops. One approach suggests that certain
types of experience might forge associations between the sensory and
motor representations of an action that may facilitate imitation at a
later time. Sensorimotor experience of this sort may occur when an
infant’s action is imitated by a caregiver or when socially synchronous
action occurs. This learning approach, therefore, predicts that the
strength of sensory–motor associations should depend on the frequency
and quality of previous experience. Here, we tested this prediction by
examining automatic imitation, that is, the tendency of an action
stimulus to facilitate the performance of that action and interfere with
the performance of an incompatible action. We required children (aged
between 3 years 8 months and 7 years 11 months) to respond to actions
performed by an experimenter (e.g., two hands clapping) with both
compatible actions (i.e., two hands clapping) and incompatible actions
(i.e., two hands waving) at different stages in the experimental
procedure. As predicted by a learning account, actions thought to be
performed in synchrony (i.e., clapping/waving) produced stronger
automatic imitation effects when compared with actions where previous
sensorimotor experience is likely to be more limited (e.g.,
pointing/hand closing). Furthermore, these automatic imitation effects
were not found to vary with age, with both compatible and incompatible
responses quickening with age. These findings suggest a role for
sensorimotor experience in the development of imitative ability.
KW - Automatic imitation
KW - Synchrony
KW - Associative sequence learning
KW - Social learning
KW - Sensorimotor experience
KW - Social cognition
U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.013
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-0965
VL - 171
SP - 113
EP - 130
JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
ER -