TY - JOUR
T1 - Architectures of domestication
T2 - on emplacing human-animal relations in the North
AU - Anderson, David G
AU - Loovers, Jan Peter Laurens
AU - Schroer, Sara Asu
AU - Wishart, Robert P
N1 - Acknowledgements. This fieldwork and discussions which led to this article was sponsored by ERC Advanced Grant 295458 Arctic Domus and ESRC grant ES‐MO110548‐1 JPI Climate Humanor. We would like to thank Rob Losey, Bente Sundsvold, and Konstantin Klokov for their comments on the manuscript. We would also like to thank that particularly engaging and constructive comments from three anonymous reviewers.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - This article explores human-animal relationships in the North by calling for renewed attention to the infrastructures and architectures, which inscribe them. We draw attention to the self-limiting quality of Arctic architectures that are designed to emphasize mutual autonomy. This approach challenges stark models that would create a crisp, clear separation between domestication as constituting a form of domination or a type of mutualism. By describing several key infrastructures of domestication – of tethers, enclosures, and traps – we hope to draw attention to the silencing of these domestic inventories. By revisiting the metaphor of the domus, we focus on the lands where these relationships are elaborated, relinking Arctic architectures to places of encounter. Drawing on in-depth fieldwork mainly from Northern North America and various sites in Northern Eurasia, we present an ethnographically informed account that stresses the nuanced way that strategies of control are blended with those of care and comfort creating unbounded homes that are good to live in.
AB - This article explores human-animal relationships in the North by calling for renewed attention to the infrastructures and architectures, which inscribe them. We draw attention to the self-limiting quality of Arctic architectures that are designed to emphasize mutual autonomy. This approach challenges stark models that would create a crisp, clear separation between domestication as constituting a form of domination or a type of mutualism. By describing several key infrastructures of domestication – of tethers, enclosures, and traps – we hope to draw attention to the silencing of these domestic inventories. By revisiting the metaphor of the domus, we focus on the lands where these relationships are elaborated, relinking Arctic architectures to places of encounter. Drawing on in-depth fieldwork mainly from Northern North America and various sites in Northern Eurasia, we present an ethnographically informed account that stresses the nuanced way that strategies of control are blended with those of care and comfort creating unbounded homes that are good to live in.
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9655.12613
DO - 10.1111/1467-9655.12613
M3 - Article
SN - 1359-0987
VL - 23
SP - 398
EP - 416
JO - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
JF - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
IS - 2
ER -