Apes' tracking of objects and collections

Trix Cacchione*, Christine Hrubesch, Josep Call

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Recent research suggests that great apes are less vulnerable to cohesion violations than human infants are. In contrast to human infants, apes successfully track nonsolid substances or split solid objects through occlusion (Cacchione & Call, 2010a; Cacchione, Hrubesch, & Call, 2012, 2013). The present study aims to investigate whether the lower vulnerability of great apes to cohesion violations also manifests when they are tracking collections. While even very young human infants appreciate the continuous existence of solid bound objects, they fail to show similar intuitions when tracking collections of objects (Chiang & Wynn, 2000). In a manual search task inspired by recent infant research, we tested whether humans' closest relatives, the great apes, showed a similar contrast in their reasoning about single solid objects and objects within collections. The results suggest that, in contrast to human infants, great apes appreciate the continuous existence of objects within collections and successfully track them through occlusion. This confirms the view that great apes are generally less vulnerable to cohesion violations than human infants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-52
Number of pages6
JournalSwiss journal of psychology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014


  • objects
  • collections
  • continuity
  • comparative research
  • Chimpanzees Pan-Troglodytes
  • Gorilla-Gorilla
  • Core Knowledge
  • Pongo-Pygmaeus
  • Great Apes
  • Intuitions
  • Solidity
  • Paniscus
  • Gravity
  • Infancy


Dive into the research topics of 'Apes' tracking of objects and collections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this