Abstract
Stories people tell of going through change incorporate and react to others around them. Positions can be taken in stories that tend towards the monological, having a singular perspective and being somewhat sealed off from others. Alternatively, stories can tend towards the dialogical, a multiple, less certain and more interactive mode. We explore multiple stories of an organizational change and analyse a paradoxical situation that emerges. We argue that although the stories may have the appearance of being dialogical, they can be seen as co-existing but self-sealing, or anti-dialogic. We introduce an interruption to the story and discuss a possibility for challenging anti-dialogic positioning in change stories.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 335-352 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Organization |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2009 |
Keywords
- dialogue
- fantasy
- insulating identity work
- self-sealing stories
- DISCOURSE
- IDENTITY
- SUBJECTIVITY
- ORGANIZATION
- WORK
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-dialogic Positioning in Change Stories: Bank Robbers, Saviours and Peons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver