Anti-dialogic Positioning in Change Stories: Bank Robbers, Saviours and Peons

Nic Beech, Stacy A. MacPhail, Christine Coupland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Stories people tell of going through change incorporate and react to others around them. Positions can be taken in stories that tend towards the monological, having a singular perspective and being somewhat sealed off from others. Alternatively, stories can tend towards the dialogical, a multiple, less certain and more interactive mode. We explore multiple stories of an organizational change and analyse a paradoxical situation that emerges. We argue that although the stories may have the appearance of being dialogical, they can be seen as co-existing but self-sealing, or anti-dialogic. We introduce an interruption to the story and discuss a possibility for challenging anti-dialogic positioning in change stories.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)335-352
    Number of pages18
    JournalOrganization
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2009

    Keywords

    • dialogue
    • fantasy
    • insulating identity work
    • self-sealing stories
    • DISCOURSE
    • IDENTITY
    • SUBJECTIVITY
    • ORGANIZATION
    • WORK

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-dialogic Positioning in Change Stories: Bank Robbers, Saviours and Peons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this