Abstract
This paper provides an ethical intepretation of the Nash choice rule. In a setting in which (cardinal) utilities are interpersonally comparable, this procedure is characterised by an impartiality requirement and by the assumption that choices are not responsive to the agents' relative ability to convert resources into utility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 151-157 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Theory and Decision |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2000 |
Keywords
- Nash bargaining
- social choice rules
- suppes-sen dominance
- BARGAINING PROBLEM