Abstract
In liberal political philosophy, from Michel de Montaigne to Judith
Shklar, cruelty – the wilful inflicting of pain on another in order to
cause anguish and fear – has been singled out as ‘the most evil
of all evils’ and as unjustifiable: the ultimate vice. An unconditional
rejection and negation of cruelty is taken to be programmatic within a
liberal paradigm. In this contribution, two anthropologists triangulate
cruelty as a concept with torture (Stade) and with love
(Rapport). Treating the capability to practise cruelty and the liability
to suffer from cruelty as universal aspects of a human condition, Stade
and Rapport aim to instantiate the precise enactment of cruelty, firstly, and secondly, to propose a process of its social negation. CIA training manuals and quotidian practice within the British National Health Service are employed as illustrative materials.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Philosophy & Social Criticism |
| Volume | Online First |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 6 Jun 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Cruelty
- Torture
- Love
- Intimacy
- Impersonalism
- Civil attention
- Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An anthropological investigation of cruelty and its contrasts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver