“Already/not yet”: St Paul’s eschatology and the modern critique of historicism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper interrogates some prominent post-Marxist engagements with St Paul’s messianism by reading them in the theological context of the anti-historicist revival of Pauline eschatology in the twentieth century. In both readings, the means through which the critique of historicism is delivered is the revival of the eschatological core of Paul’s proclamation. Paul is read as inaugurating a “new world” of freedom, love and redemptive hope as opposed to the “old world” of oppression, sorrow, death and despair. And yet, it is exactly in such an apocalyptic reading of Pauline eschatology that both philosophical and theological critiques of historicism, despite protestations to the contrary, remain prisoners to the aporias of a historicist temporality. The symptom of the philosophers’ residual parasitism on historicism is expressed as antinomian negativism, while in the case of the theologians it can take the form of a self-assured Church triumphalism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1015-1038
Number of pages24
JournalPhilosophy & Social Criticism
Volume44
Issue number9
Early online date17 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • St Paul
  • Eschatology
  • Historicism
  • Alain Badiou
  • Slavoj Žižek
  • Giorgio Agamben
  • Henri de Lubac

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Already/not yet”: St Paul’s eschatology and the modern critique of historicism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this