Abstract
This paper interrogates some prominent post-Marxist engagements with St Paul’s messianism by reading them in the theological context of the anti-historicist revival of Pauline eschatology in the twentieth century. In both readings, the means through which the critique of historicism is delivered is the revival of the eschatological core of Paul’s proclamation. Paul is read as inaugurating a “new world” of freedom, love and redemptive hope as opposed to the “old world” of oppression, sorrow, death and despair. And yet, it is exactly in such an apocalyptic reading of Pauline eschatology that both philosophical and theological critiques of historicism, despite protestations to the contrary, remain prisoners to the aporias of a historicist temporality. The symptom of the philosophers’ residual parasitism on historicism is expressed as antinomian negativism, while in the case of the theologians it can take the form of a self-assured Church triumphalism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1015-1038 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Philosophy & Social Criticism |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 17 Apr 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2018 |
Keywords
- St Paul
- Eschatology
- Historicism
- Alain Badiou
- Slavoj Žižek
- Giorgio Agamben
- Henri de Lubac
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“Already/not yet”: St Paul’s eschatology and the modern critique of historicism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Vassilios Paipais
- School of International Relations - Senior Lecturer
- St Andrews Centre for the Receptions of Antiquity
Person: Academic