Alliance behaviour, the absentee liberator and the influence of soft power: Post-communist state positions over the Iraq War in 2003

Rick Fawn*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Thirteen post-communist governments gave diplomatic support to the Anglo-American position on Iraq in 2003; many also gave military assistance to the war itself and most contributed to post-war operations. However ‘small states’ may be defined, none of these 13 actors can be considered a major power in international relations. This article assesses the reasons for their support of the United States. It first considers what material gains they expected and gained, and applies their support of the US against expectations of alliance behaviour. It then contrasts the behaviour of those Central and East European states with that of Belarus and of Serbia. The article then argues that an important explanation for post-communist state behaviour over Iraq comes from an expression of existential values that can be understood through the notion of ‘soft power’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-480
Number of pages16
JournalCambridge Review of International Affairs
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alliance behaviour, the absentee liberator and the influence of soft power: Post-communist state positions over the Iraq War in 2003'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this