Abstract
The native/alien distinction is central to nature conservation, but both the distinction itself and policies based on it are contested. Because the terms “native” and “alien” do not describe biological characteristics but dispersal history, definitions rest on spatiotemporal boundaries which are socially constructed. Invasive alien species have severe ecological and economic impacts, and so conservationists defend the distinction and anti‐alien policies. However, opposition to all alien species in principle has been critiqued on numerous grounds, most controversially because of the parallels with racism, but also because it often clashes with cultural values. Some call for the native/alien framework to be abandoned, yet it is being reinforced worldwide in conservation policy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The International Encyclopedia of Geography |
Subtitle of host publication | People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology |
Editors | Douglas Richardson, Noel Castree, Michael F. Goodchild, Audrey Kobayashi, Richard A. Marston |
Place of Publication | New York |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell |
Number of pages | 8 |
Edition | 2nd |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 29 Mar 2018 |
Keywords
- Biodiversity
- Conservation
- Ecology
- Ecosystems
- Environment
- Nature
- Scale