A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack

Evangelos Ntontis*, Klara Jurstakova, Fergus G. Neville, S. Alexander Haslam, Stephen D. Reicher

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

On January 6th, 2021, Donald Trump's speech during a ‘Save America’ rally was followed by mass violence, with Trump's supporters storming the U.S. Capitol to prevent the certification of Joe Biden's victory in the presidential election. In its wake, there was a great deal of debate around whether the speech contained direct instructions for the subsequent violence. In this paper, we use a social identity perspective on leadership (and more specifically, on toxic leadership) to analyse the speech and see how its overall argument relates to violence. We show that Trump's argument rests on the populist distinction between the American people and elites. He moralises these groups as good and evil respectively and proposes that the very existence of America is under threat if the election result stands. On this basis he proposes that all true Americans are obligated to act in order prevent Biden's certification and to ensure that the good prevails over evil. While Trump does not explicitly say what such action entails, he also removes normative and moral impediments to extreme action. In this way, taken as a whole, Trump's speech enables rather than demands violence and ultimately it provides a warrant for the violence that ensued.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
VolumeEarly View
Early online date21 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Capitol attack
  • Identity leadership
  • Mass mobilisation
  • Social identity
  • Toxic leadership
  • Trump
  • Violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this