A puzzle about accommodation and truth

Derek Nelson Ball; Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes

doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01693-2

A puzzle about accommodation and truth

Derek Nelson Ball, Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss a puzzle involving accommodation. The puzzle is based on three assumptions. The first assumption is that accommodation takes place after an utterance. The second assumption is that accommodation can make a difference to the truth-value of an utterance even if the utterance is not about the future. The third assumption is that something that takes place after an utterance cannot make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance unless the utterance is about the future. Since these assumptions are jointly inconsistent, one of them must be false. The question is which one we ought to reject. The majority of the discussion is devoted to discussing each of the options, and the tentative conclusion is that the most plausible strategy is to reject the third thesis. That amounts to saying that something that takes place after an utterance can make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance even if the utterance is not about the future.

Original language	English
Number of pages	18
Journal	Philosophical Studies
Volume	First Online
Early online date	4 Jul 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01693-2
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 4 Jul 2021

Keywords

Accommodation
Truth
Temporal externalism
Relativism
Conversational score
Disagreement
Externalism

Access to Document

10.1007/s11098-021-01693-2Licence: CC BY

Ball_2021_PS_Puzzle_CC
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Final published version, 233 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{988c511be5c642c6bff29e4bc1525585,

title = "A puzzle about accommodation and truth",

abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss a puzzle involving accommodation. The puzzle is based on three assumptions. The first assumption is that accommodation takes place after an utterance. The second assumption is that accommodation can make a difference to the truth-value of an utterance even if the utterance is not about the future. The third assumption is that something that takes place after an utterance cannot make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance unless the utterance is about the future. Since these assumptions are jointly inconsistent, one of them must be false. The question is which one we ought to reject. The majority of the discussion is devoted to discussing each of the options, and the tentative conclusion is that the most plausible strategy is to reject the third thesis. That amounts to saying that something that takes place after an utterance can make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance even if the utterance is not about the future.",

keywords = "Accommodation, Truth, Temporal externalism, Relativism, Conversational score, Disagreement, Externalism",

author = "Ball, {Derek Nelson} and Huvenes, {Torfinn Thomesen}",

note = "Open access funding provided by Umea University.",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1007/s11098-021-01693-2",

language = "English",

volume = "First Online",

journal = "Philosophical Studies",

issn = "0031-8116",

publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A puzzle about accommodation and truth

AU - Ball, Derek Nelson

AU - Huvenes, Torfinn Thomesen

N1 - Open access funding provided by Umea University.

PY - 2021/7/4

Y1 - 2021/7/4

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss a puzzle involving accommodation. The puzzle is based on three assumptions. The first assumption is that accommodation takes place after an utterance. The second assumption is that accommodation can make a difference to the truth-value of an utterance even if the utterance is not about the future. The third assumption is that something that takes place after an utterance cannot make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance unless the utterance is about the future. Since these assumptions are jointly inconsistent, one of them must be false. The question is which one we ought to reject. The majority of the discussion is devoted to discussing each of the options, and the tentative conclusion is that the most plausible strategy is to reject the third thesis. That amounts to saying that something that takes place after an utterance can make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance even if the utterance is not about the future.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss a puzzle involving accommodation. The puzzle is based on three assumptions. The first assumption is that accommodation takes place after an utterance. The second assumption is that accommodation can make a difference to the truth-value of an utterance even if the utterance is not about the future. The third assumption is that something that takes place after an utterance cannot make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance unless the utterance is about the future. Since these assumptions are jointly inconsistent, one of them must be false. The question is which one we ought to reject. The majority of the discussion is devoted to discussing each of the options, and the tentative conclusion is that the most plausible strategy is to reject the third thesis. That amounts to saying that something that takes place after an utterance can make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance even if the utterance is not about the future.

KW - Accommodation

KW - Truth

KW - Temporal externalism

KW - Relativism

KW - Conversational score

KW - Disagreement

KW - Externalism

U2 - 10.1007/s11098-021-01693-2

DO - 10.1007/s11098-021-01693-2

M3 - Article

SN - 0031-8116

VL - First Online

JO - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

ER -

A puzzle about accommodation and truth

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this