A mixed methods comparative evaluation of a low cost otoscope (Arclight) with a traditional device in twenty-one clinicians

Shi Ying Hey; Joanna C. Buckley; Somayyeh Shahsavari; Obaid Kousha; Kerry A.  Haddow; Andrew Blaikie; Frank David Lathangie  Walker

doi:10.1111/coa.13403

A mixed methods comparative evaluation of a low cost otoscope (Arclight) with a traditional device in twenty-one clinicians

Shi Ying Hey, Joanna C. Buckley, Somayyeh Shahsavari, Obaid Kousha, Kerry A. Haddow, Andrew Blaikie, Frank David Lathangie Walker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

According to the World Health Organisation estimate, the global burden of illness from chronic ear infection affects about 4% of the world population (up to 330 million) with ear discharge and 60% of whom (up to 200 million) suffer from significant hearing impairment.1 Alarmingly, over 90% of the burden of chronic ear infections is borne by low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).

Original language	English
Number of pages	4
Journal	Clinical Otolaryngology
Volume	Early View
Early online date	6 Aug 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13403
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 6 Aug 2019

Access to Document

10.1111/coa.13403

Master Manuscript Revision
© 2019, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13403
Accepted author manuscript, 279 KB

Cite this

@article{153e9f3786cd4514921ec0ae2ae3b162,

title = "A mixed methods comparative evaluation of a low cost otoscope (Arclight) with a traditional device in twenty-one clinicians",

abstract = "According to the World Health Organisation estimate, the global burden of illness from chronic ear infection affects about 4\% of the world population (up to 330 million) with ear discharge and 60\% of whom (up to 200 million) suffer from significant hearing impairment.1 Alarmingly, over 90\% of the burden of chronic ear infections is borne by low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).",

author = "Hey, \{Shi Ying\} and Buckley, \{Joanna C.\} and Somayyeh Shahsavari and Obaid Kousha and Haddow, \{Kerry A.\} and Andrew Blaikie and Walker, \{Frank David Lathangie\}",

year = "2019",

month = aug,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1111/coa.13403",

language = "English",

volume = "Early View",

journal = "Clinical Otolaryngology",

issn = "1749-4478",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A mixed methods comparative evaluation of a low cost otoscope (Arclight) with a traditional device in twenty-one clinicians

AU - Hey, Shi Ying

AU - Buckley, Joanna C.

AU - Shahsavari, Somayyeh

AU - Kousha, Obaid

AU - Haddow, Kerry A.

AU - Blaikie, Andrew

AU - Walker, Frank David Lathangie

PY - 2019/8/6

Y1 - 2019/8/6

N2 - According to the World Health Organisation estimate, the global burden of illness from chronic ear infection affects about 4% of the world population (up to 330 million) with ear discharge and 60% of whom (up to 200 million) suffer from significant hearing impairment.1 Alarmingly, over 90% of the burden of chronic ear infections is borne by low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).

AB - According to the World Health Organisation estimate, the global burden of illness from chronic ear infection affects about 4% of the world population (up to 330 million) with ear discharge and 60% of whom (up to 200 million) suffer from significant hearing impairment.1 Alarmingly, over 90% of the burden of chronic ear infections is borne by low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85070699291

U2 - 10.1111/coa.13403

DO - 10.1111/coa.13403

M3 - Article

SN - 1749-4478

VL - Early View

JO - Clinical Otolaryngology

JF - Clinical Otolaryngology

ER -

A mixed methods comparative evaluation of a low cost otoscope (Arclight) with a traditional device in twenty-one clinicians

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this