A Longitudinal Analysis of Family Migration and the Gender Gap in Earnings in the United States and Great Britain

Thomas J. Cooke, Paul Joseph Boyle, Kenneth Couch, Petra Maria Feijten

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    63 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article uses longitudinal data for the United States and Great Britain to examine the impact of residential mobility and childbirth on the earnings of women, their family earnings, and the related division of earnings by gender. This project is the fi rst to compare explicitly the impact of childbirth and family migration on women’s earnings, and it extends prior cross-sectional and longitudinal studies on isolated countries by providing a direct contrast between two major industrialized nations, using comparable measures. The results indicate that families respond in similar ways in both countries to migration and childbirth. In response to both migration and childbirth, women’s earnings fall at the time of the event and recover slowly afterward, but the magnitude of the impact is roughly twice as large for childbirth as for migration. However, migration—but not the birth of a child—is also associated with a significant increase in total family earnings because of increased husbands’ earnings. As
    a result, the effect of migration on the relative earnings of wives to husbands is similar to the effect of childbirth. These results suggest that family migration should be given consideration in the literature on the gender earnings gap.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)147-167
    Number of pages21
    JournalDemography
    Volume46
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Longitudinal Analysis of Family Migration and the Gender Gap in Earnings in the United States and Great Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this