A kenotic theologian’s response to Andrew Loke’s ‘kryptic model’ of the Incarnation

Charles Stephen Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In this article I compare the kryptic model of the Incarnation, developed by Andrew Loke, with two other models, the “two-minds” model and the kenotic model. All three models succeed in showing the logical coherence of the doctrine of the Incarnation, and I concede that Loke’s model has some of the advantages of both of the other two, while avoiding some perceived disadvantages. However, I argue that Loke’s model also has some of the disadvantages of both of the other models. In conclusion I argue that the alleged superiority of the kryptic model over a kenotic model vanishes if one is willing to question the reliability of our a priori rational intuitions about the nature of God on the basis of a view of the divine nature that seems to fit better with the biblical picture of God.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-38
JournalPhilosophia Christi
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'A kenotic theologian’s response to Andrew Loke’s ‘kryptic model’ of the Incarnation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this