Abstract
This review addresses three recent developments in the collective action literature. First, we demonstrate that normative and non-normative collective action participation can be predicted by different psychological variables. Second, we show that collective action participation has emotional and identity-related consequences for activists that shape their motivation to engage in future action. Third, we illustrate that members of disadvantaged groups are faced with two dilemmas: the dilemma of alternative ways of identity management and the dilemma of affective loyalties towards the outgroup, both of which present barriers to social change by undermining protest intentions. In the final part of the review, we outline an integrative framework that maps out the dynamic processes between antecedents of, barriers to and outcomes of collective action participation and highlight a number of directions for future research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 43-92 |
| Journal | European Review of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 2 Nov 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Collective action
- Protest
- Social change
- Non-normative collective action
- Disadvantaged groups
- Disidentification
- Identity management
- Contact
- Terrorism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver