A cross-national comparison of the impact of family migration on women's employment status

Paul Joseph Boyle, TJ Cooke, K Halfacree, D Smith

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    173 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper we consider the effects of family migration on women 's employment status, using census microdata from Great Britain and the United States. We test a simple hypothesis that falmilies tend to move long distances in favor of the male 's career and that this can have a detrimental effect on women 's employment status. Unlike many previous studies of this question, our work emphasizes the importance of identifying couples that have migrated together, rather than simply comparing long-distance (fe)male migrants with nonmigrant (fe)males individually. We demonstrate that women 's employment status is harmed by family migration; the results we present are surprisingly consistent for Great Britain and the United States, despite differing economic situations and cultural norms regarding gender and migration. We also demonstrate that studies that fail to identify, linked migrant couples are likely to underestimate the negative effects of family migration on women 's employment status.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)201-213
    Number of pages13
    JournalDemography
    Volume38
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2001

    Keywords

    • SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS
    • MARRIED-WOMEN
    • UNITED-STATES
    • GENDER
    • LABOR
    • MOBILITY
    • WORK
    • STRATEGIES
    • DECISIONS
    • DIVISION

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-national comparison of the impact of family migration on women's employment status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this