A Comparison of Insitu and Laboratory Methods to Measure Mudflat Erodibility

CL Amos; HA Christian; J Grant; DM Paterson

A Comparison of Insitu and Laboratory Methods to Measure Mudflat Erodibility

CL Amos, HA Christian, J Grant, DM Paterson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Hydraulic And Environmental Modeling : Coastal Waters
Editors	RA Falconer, SN Chandlerwilde, SQ Liu
Pages	325-336
Number of pages	12
Publication status	Published - 3 Jan 1992

Cite this

@inproceedings{2f851daa86a841e1afb8d5525e630e1d,

title = "A Comparison of Insitu and Laboratory Methods to Measure Mudflat Erodibility",

author = "CL Amos and HA Christian and J Grant and DM Paterson",

year = "1992",

month = jan,

day = "3",

language = "English",

pages = "325--336",

editor = "RA Falconer and SN Chandlerwilde and SQ Liu",

booktitle = "Hydraulic And Environmental Modeling : Coastal Waters",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A Comparison of Insitu and Laboratory Methods to Measure Mudflat Erodibility

AU - Amos, CL

AU - Christian, HA

AU - Grant, J

AU - Paterson, DM

PY - 1992/1/3

Y1 - 1992/1/3

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pure_st-andrews_wos_starter&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:A1992BX88D00027&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 325

EP - 336

BT - Hydraulic And Environmental Modeling : Coastal Waters

A2 - Falconer, RA

A2 - Chandlerwilde, SN

A2 - Liu, SQ

ER -

A Comparison of Insitu and Laboratory Methods to Measure Mudflat Erodibility

Other files and links

Cite this