A comparison of cotton-tipped and nylon flocked swabs for culture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from oropharyngeal samples

Tiffany R. Phillips*, Marjan Tabesh, Christopher K. Fairley, Kate Maddaford, Shivani Pasricha, Rebecca Wigan, Vesna De Petra, Deborah A. Williamson, Eric P.F. Chow*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Our aim was to determine if there was a difference in culture positivity for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea when sampling using a nylon-flocked versus cotton-tipped swab. We collected FLOQSwabs and cotton-tipped swabs from individuals aged ≥ 18 years who had untreated oropharyngeal gonorrhoea detected by NAAT between November 2019-June 2020.Of 78 participants, 32 (41.0%) were culture-positive for N. gonorrhoeae from either swab. Of these 32, 29 (90.6%, 95%CI: 75.0%-98.0%) were positive on both swabs, one (3.1%, 95%CI: 0.0%-16.2%) tested positive on FLOQSwab only and two (6.2%, 95%CI: 0.1%-20.8%) tested positive on cotton-tipped swabs only. There was moderate agreement between the swabs in the amount of bacterial growth (Cohen's Kappa (k)=0.745; 95%CI: 0.622-0.868, p<0.001). Our results showed that the proportion of positive results was comparable using the FLOQSwabs versus the cotton-tipped swabs for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea culture.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115455
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume101
Issue number3
Early online date10 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Clinical Practice
  • FLOQSwab
  • Oropharyngeal Gonorrhoea

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of cotton-tipped and nylon flocked swabs for culture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from oropharyngeal samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this