Abstract
The Antarctic euphausiids Euphausia superba and E. crystallorophias were sampled using aln 8 m(2) rectangular midwater trawl inside the caldera of Deception Island. Specimens of the same species were collected on the same day from the strandline and sublittoral fringe within the caldera at a bay where these euphausiids had been incapacitated by high temperature geothermally heated waters. Differences between length frequency distributions of samples obtained by both methods were investigated once net-caught specimens had been subject to the simulated effects of geothermally heated waters. Differences between maturity stage/sex ratios for E. superba samples were also assessed. No significant differences between sizes of net-caught or beach-sampled E. crystallorophias were detected, but significant differences were found between both the sizes and sex/maturity stages for E. super ba samples. Possible explanations for these differences are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 109-114 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Polar Biology |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 1999 |
Keywords
- PRYDZ BAY-REGION
- SOUTH GEORGIA
- SUPERBA DANA
- DECEPTION-ISLAND
- KRILL
- SWARMS
- SIZE
- SEABIRDS
- POPULATIONS
- VARIABILITY
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of Antarctic euphausiids sampled by net and from geothermally-heated waters: insights into sampling bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver