Abstract
Haldane's rule is one of the ‘two rules of speciation’. It states that
if one sex is ‘absent, rare or sterile’ in a hybrid population, then
that sex will be heterogametic. Since Haldane first made this
observation, 100 years have passed and still questions arise over how
many independent examples exist and what the underlying causes of
Haldane's rule are. This review aims to examine research that has
occurred over the last century. It seeks to do so by discussing possible
causes of Haldane's rule, as well as gaps in the research of these
causes that could be readily addressed today. After 100 years of
research, it can be concluded that Haldane's rule is a complicated one,
and much current knowledge has been accrued by studying the model
organisms of speciation. This has led to the primacy of dominance theory
and faster-male theory as explanations for Haldane's rule. However,
some of the most interesting findings of the 21st century with regard to
Haldane's rule have involved investigating a wider range of taxa
emphasizing the need to continue using comparative methods, including
ever more taxa as new cases are discovered.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 337-346 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Evolutionary Biology |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 10 Nov 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2023 |
Keywords
- Dominance theory
- Dosage compensation
- Faster-male theory
- Faster-X theory
- Haldane's rule
- Hybrid sterility
- Meiotic drive
- Postzygotic isolation
- Sex chromosomes
- Speciation