Supplementary material from "Bayesian networks for network inference in biology"

Bayesian Networks (BNs) have been used for reconstructing interactions from biological data, in disciplines ranging from molecular biology, to ecology, and neuroscience. BNs learn conditional dependencies between variables which best ‘explain’ the data, represented as a directed graph which approximates the relationships between variables. In the 2000s BNs were a popular method that promised an approach capable of inferring biological networks from data. Here we review the use of BNs applied to biological data over the past two decades, and evaluate their efficacy. We find that BNs are successful in inferring biological networks, frequently identifying novel interactions or network components missed by previous analyses. We suggest that as false positive results are underreported, it is difficult to assess the accuracy of BNs in inferring biological networks. BN learning appears most successful for small numbers of variables with high-quality datasets that either discretise the data into few states or include perturbative data. We suggest that BNs have failed to live up to the promise of the 2000s but that this is most likely due to experimental constraints on datasets, and the success of BNs at inferring networks in a variety of biological contexts suggests they are a powerful tool for biologists.