A comparative analysis of response times shows that multisensory benefits and interactions are not equivalent (dataset)

Bobby Richard Innes (Creator)
Thomas Otto (Creator)

School of Psychology and Neuroscience

Dataset

Date made available	27 Feb 2019
Publisher	University of St Andrews
Date of data production	2016 - 2017

Contact

[email protected]

DOI
10.17630/c8cbd7b7-e2b3-4e62-bb3d-66fce081ff59

Access Dataset

Response_Time_Data.csv
File: application/octet-stream, 504 KB
Type: Dataset
Licence: CC BY
Documentation.txt
File: text/plain, 771 bytes
Type: Text
Licence: CC BY

Related PhD thesis

1 Article

A comparative analysis of response times shows that multisensory benefits and interactions are not equivalent
Innes, B. R. & Otto, T. U., 27 Feb 2019, In: Scientific Reports. 9, 10 p., 2921.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File

Targeting benefits and interactions in multisensory processing: a novel modelling framework for exploring the redundant signal effect
Innes, B. R. (Author), Otto, T. (Supervisor), 28 Jun 2019
Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis (PhD)

Experiment 2: Signal Duration vs. Task-Irrelevant Stimulation (dataset)
Innes, B. R. (Creator) & Otto, T. (Supervisor), University of St Andrews, 5 Jun 2022
DOI: 10.17630/f7d830a6-aea0-452f-8efc-54fb68f9184c, http://hdl.handle.net/10023/17968
Dataset: Thesis dataset

File
Experiment 3: Signal Strength vs. Response Effector (dataset)
Innes, B. R. (Creator) & Otto, T. (Supervisor), University of St Andrews, 5 Jun 2022
DOI: 10.17630/a21df9d8-0298-4360-9c62-9425870a1b28, http://hdl.handle.net/10023/17968
Dataset: Thesis dataset

File

Cite this